The Science Center

Aliquots for the masses!

Dedicated to defending scientific integrity, combatting misinformation, and sharing my love of science.



→ About

→ Ask me anything
Carl Linnaeus and his Autoscopic Double
Carl Linnaeus is most famous for being the father of modern taxonomy. But as chronicled in his new book Hallucinations, Dr. Oliver Sacks describes how Linnaeus is notorious for something quite different - he saw himself in double. 

Linnaeus suffered from migraine attacks, and according to neurologist Macdonald Critchley, when his headaches came on, he’d hallucinate. A second, phantom Carl Linnaeus would often appear — seen only by the first — and would float about, doing whatever Real Carl was doing. So Linnaeus would be in his garden, checking out a plant or plucking a flower, and he could see, at a respectful distance, the Other Carl stooping and plucking the same way at the same time. Linnaeus didn’t fear his phantom; in fact he got used to it.
As Critchley describes it, the phantom might sit in Linnaeus’ seat at his library desk, and Real Linnaeus, would, presumably, ignore him. One time, Professor Linnaeus was lecturing at his university and decided to run down to his office to fetch a specimen to show the class, and Critchley says, he got to his office, “He opened the door rapidly, intending to enter, but pulled up at once saying, ‘Oh! I’m there already.’ “

Sacks describes this totally-not-made-up condition as something called autoscopy, and though it’s obviously not common, there is quite a bit already known about autoscopic doubles. For example, autoscopic doubles are always mirror images, so one’s right side is transposed onto the left side and vice versa. Sacks also explains how “the double is a purely visual phenomenon, with no identity or intentionality of its own. It has no desires and takes no initiatives; it is passive and neutral.” Autoscopic doubles are also accompanied by unpleasant symptoms like migraines, epilepsy, post-traumatic disorders, and other brain issues. But man, wouldn’t it be fascinating to have a double for just a day or two?

Carl Linnaeus and his Autoscopic Double

Carl Linnaeus is most famous for being the father of modern taxonomy. But as chronicled in his new book Hallucinations, Dr. Oliver Sacks describes how Linnaeus is notorious for something quite different - he saw himself in double. 

Linnaeus suffered from migraine attacks, and according to neurologist Macdonald Critchley, when his headaches came on, he’d hallucinate. A second, phantom Carl Linnaeus would often appear — seen only by the first — and would float about, doing whatever Real Carl was doing. So Linnaeus would be in his garden, checking out a plant or plucking a flower, and he could see, at a respectful distance, the Other Carl stooping and plucking the same way at the same time. Linnaeus didn’t fear his phantom; in fact he got used to it.

As Critchley describes it, the phantom might sit in Linnaeus’ seat at his library desk, and Real Linnaeus, would, presumably, ignore him. One time, Professor Linnaeus was lecturing at his university and decided to run down to his office to fetch a specimen to show the class, and Critchley says, he got to his office, “He opened the door rapidly, intending to enter, but pulled up at once saying, ‘Oh! I’m there already.’ “

Sacks describes this totally-not-made-up condition as something called autoscopy, and though it’s obviously not common, there is quite a bit already known about autoscopic doubles. For example, autoscopic doubles are always mirror images, so one’s right side is transposed onto the left side and vice versa. Sacks also explains how “the double is a purely visual phenomenon, with no identity or intentionality of its own. It has no desires and takes no initiatives; it is passive and neutral.” Autoscopic doubles are also accompanied by unpleasant symptoms like migraines, epilepsy, post-traumatic disorders, and other brain issues. But man, wouldn’t it be fascinating to have a double for just a day or two?

  2:00 pm  |   November 8 2012   |  103 notes  

  1. llaurennicolee likes this
  2. goodgeology likes this
  3. molecularlifesciences likes this
  4. rexdemenum reblogged this from sciencecenter
  5. photocyte reblogged this from 14-billion-years-later and added:
    I didn’t know this: how cool.
  6. duckish reblogged this from leupagus
  7. everyhopeanycost likes this
  8. genqueue reblogged this from project-argus
  9. followthedawn reblogged this from deadbishop
  10. rob-anybody likes this
  11. epistolaefeminae likes this
  12. ysabette likes this
  13. leupagus reblogged this from deadbishop and added:
    NO IT WOULD NOT IT WOULD BE GODDAMN TERRIFYING. And, let’s be real, annoying as fuck.
  14. deadbishop reblogged this from project-argus
  15. shackledfreedom reblogged this from project-argus and added:
    Wow
  16. shackledfreedom likes this
  17. ignatius-m reblogged this from project-argus and added:
    Hmm. Thanks but no thanks. XD
  18. psapao reblogged this from project-argus
  19. letuslearn reblogged this from project-argus
  20. kaiyves likes this
  21. biognosis likes this
  22. blindmen6 likes this
  23. project-argus reblogged this from 14-billion-years-later
  24. lifethroughgeologictime likes this
  25. buckyphile likes this
  26. imaginariumofmatt reblogged this from sciencecenter
  27. parisopolis reblogged this from peevishpants
  28. certifiedsidekick reblogged this from peevishpants
  29. carriesbrigade likes this
  30. peevishpants reblogged this from sciencecenter
  31. deugen3 likes this
  32. charliesdragon reblogged this from sciencecenter
  33. semperaugustus likes this
  34. shmaltz-iodine likes this
  35. lifewithpareidolia likes this
  36. lonely-pineapple reblogged this from cleod
  37. fiddlefaffle likes this
  38. guozp likes this
  39. kasetnik likes this
  40. jtangster reblogged this from 14-billion-years-later
  41. jtangster likes this
  42. cleod reblogged this from 14-billion-years-later
  43. fun-ta-mental reblogged this from sciencecenter
  44. fun-ta-mental likes this
  45. robotnoise reblogged this from 14-billion-years-later
  46. scienceandandrogyny reblogged this from sciencecenter
  47. allacharade reblogged this from 14-billion-years-later
  48. giant-pancakes reblogged this from sciencecenter
  49. godlessmachine reblogged this from 14-billion-years-later
  50. estherks reblogged this from sciencecenter
  51. Show more notesLoading...
Back   |   Next
twentyten by Justin Waggoner